Looks like Traitor Trump is Just Who We Thought He Was
There's more and more examples piling up that demonstrate this is true.
There's no smoking gun yet but it certainly doesn't sound like it's going great for him.
I'm still not happy that Comey had evidence in JULY 2016, but suppressed it, but then announced "New Evidence" against Hillary in October 2016. Which turned out to be false.
Something going on there too.
Eh, that doesn't sound that sketchy.
You could concoct any number of possible stories and then find evidence to support the story. Background noise is great for that.
Your story isn't convincing anyone (except for idiots) until your story fits the totality of the evidence.
So, stated another way, there was probably evidence available in July that Trump was colluding with Russia but not enough of it to tell a convincing enough story to bother investigating it.
Yet Comey shat all over hillary. All of a sudden he needs evidence? Maybe hillary didn't wink at him.
Huh? Didn't it take them about a year to investigate Hillary's email things?
No, I don't think so. And Comey made it a point to add needless condemnation to Hillary's email silliness. And when the FBI did exonerate her, his silence was deafening.
There was the Anthony Weiner thing, which probably convinced enough idiots to vote for Trump in PA, WI and MI to foul our country for the foreseeable future.
Wait, Anthony Weiner takes pictures of his weiner, so don't vote Democratic.
Trump "grabs them by the pussy", so vote Republican?
I'm confused. I didn't hear "Anthony Weiner" the entire fall 2016, it was all Hillary bashing.
How do you come to this conclusion?
No, remember after the 3rd debate, Hillary was crushing it, then Comey brings up that Hillary was mentioned in the emails that Weiner had saved?
And then, a few days later, it was all nothing, never mind, nothing to see here?
Huh! It WAS Weiner's email server. I had missed that. I mean, I knew about Comey, and I knew about "new emails", but I didn't know it came from the Weiner investigation.
> No, remember after the 3rd debate, Hillary was crushing it, then Comey brings up that Hillary was mentioned in the emails that Weiner had saved?
> And then, a few days later, it was all nothing, never mind, nothing to see here?
Again, I guess I'm not eager to see a conspiracy here.
The simplest explanation is Comey thought there were a ton of new emails showing that Hillary hid a bunch of sketchy illegal shit and he felt obligated to disclose them now, for fear that he colluded in helping Hillary win if he sat on them.
He announced them and then they looked further and realized they were nothing special.
lol, so if I understand libs fact that Comey is investigating Trump ties makes it real; but everything he's ever said a/b Hillary is a lie?
>The simplest explanation is Comey thought there were a ton of new emails showing that Hillary hid a bunch of sketchy illegal shit and he felt obligated to disclose them now, for fear that he colluded in helping Hillary win if he sat on them.
It violated protocol and was markedly different from the way he handled the Trump Russia connection. The Justice Department is currently investigating him now on this.
Hubble and Shylock have the Hillary email story so worng.
She was not exonerated. There was new evidence in the last minute.
The procecutors decided the new evidence did not provide sufficient justification to indict.
That is far from "exoneration".
She sent 3 secret emails that had been misclassified. That's it.
Yes, she was exonerated.
Bottom-line, 3 emails and lying about a blow job were all that 24 years and millions of dollars of investigations got the Clintons on. For that, you didn't do your part to prevent a monster from taking power.
The amount of shit you have to avert your eyes to in order to defend imperialists already requires psyche-damaging levels of denial.
Add Zionist to that and it's a wonder you can function at all.